Latest Issue -

Vol. 144 (2005), No. 3

This issue of the Review has a definite legal tang as it turns to issues long at the heart of the ILO’s concerns. It focuses first on the International Labour Organization’s monitoring procedures as seen from a privileged participant-observer’s position, and then on the evolution of labour law in the Russian Federation, comparing the situation at the end of communist rule with that brought about by the new Labour Code which entered into force in February 2002. The third article lies outside the legal sphere, and is concerned with the tenure–productivity–employment relationship, raising the central question of whether a stable workforce is good for the economy. > more

In this issue:

• The standard-setting and monitoring activity of the ILO: Legal questions and practical experience, by Alfred Wisskirchen
• The new labour law of the Russian Federation, by Arturo Bronstein
• Is a stable workforce good for productivity?, by Peter Auer, Janine Berg and Ibrahim Coulibaly

The International Labour Review is a member of the following associations:

• International Association of Labour Law Journals
• Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers