International Labour Organization
SEAPAT
South-East Asia and the Pacific Multidisciplinary Advisory Team
ILO/SEAPAT's OnLine Gender Learning &
Information Module
Unit 1: A conceptual framework
for gender analysis and planning
Why do gender analysis?
Introduction
The human rights rationale
The social justice rationale
The socio-economic development
rationale
Research findings
Introduction
In the ILO’s work, gender analysis is a tool for identifying the different
roles and needs of men and women in the world of work. Through gender analysis,
planners can develop and implement concrete measures to promote equality
of opportunity and treatment between men and women workers.
In the past, planners have often failed to take into account the different
roles and needs of men and women in the world of work. This neglect has
resulted in inappropriate design of policies and programmes that do not
meet the needs of both men and women in the intended client population.
Worse, it has sometimes had unanticipated negative effects on the position
of women workers.
Thus, the ILO has now decided as a matter of institutional policy to
attempt to mainstream gender concerns into its activities, through gender
analysis and planning.
From the point of view of the ILO, there are three broad rationales
for seeking to achieve the goal of gender mainstreaming, or in other words,
for promoting the fundamental principle of equality of opportunity and
treatment between men and women. These are briefly outlined below:
The human rights rationale
In the first place, the ILO approaches the goal of equality of opportunity
and treatment between men and women as a matter of human rights and as
an essential condition for achieving effective democracy. It considers
the fight against discrimination on the basis of sex a fundamental issue
in protecting human rights.
In this regard, the ILO emphasises women’s legal rights and the elimination
of all kinds of de facto and de jure discrimination on the
basis of sex in employment and occupation.
The social justice
rationale
Second, ensuring gender equality in the world of work is a matter of
social justice and poverty alleviation.
From this point of view, the ILO stresses:
-
women’s access to employment and training
-
women’s conditions of work
-
social protection
It also gives particular emphasis to low-income women, unemployed women,
women in the urban informal sector and in the rural sector, women heads
of households, migrant women, and women in a vulnerable position in the
labour market.
The socio-economic development
rationale
Third, the ILO considers promoting gender equality as a matter of social
and economic development. To achieve this, it supports the participation
of women in decision-making and in shaping development and labour policies
and practices that adequately respond to equality objectives.
The ILO also works towards women’s empowerment and their active involvement
in public life. These goals are essential for bringing women’s creative
and innovative perspectives to bear in shaping the design and implementation
of development policies and strategies. They are also essential for helping
women obtain an equal share of the benefits of development.
Research findings
Broadly speaking, recent analytical work in gender and development attempts
to document the benefits of paying increased attention to gender in development
programming. It also tries to demonstrate the costs of neglecting attention
to gender. The list below selects a few of the key findings.
-
Gender inequalities hamper socioeconomic growth. This is the main
message of the World Bank's official report to the Fouth UN World Conference
on Women in Beijing, Toward Gender Equality: The Role of Public Policy.
The report describes the causal pathways through which gender inequalities
in society can threaten the success of development policies and programs.
It gives examples to illustrate this point.
-
Public policy can play a role in reducing gender inequalities. The
same World Bank report goes on to describe why public policy can reduce
gender inequlaities. Such inequalities represent a form of "market failure",
which can be rectified by policy interventions. Since reducing gender inequalities
results in positive externalities, public policy has an important role
to play in removing these inequalities.
-
Much of the analytical work quantifies the private and social returns to
girls' education as compared to that of boys. It finds that while the private
returns to education are high for both boys and girls, the social returns
to girls' education exceed those for boys' education, especially at the
secondary level. Some of these social returns are summarized in a series
of slides that from part of this module. These can be found under Social
gains to girls education and More
benefits of investing in girls education respectively.
-
Analysis has also examined the relationship between higher levels of human
capital and inputs for women farmers and agricultural productivity. Findings
suggest that raising the level of human capital and inputs of women farmers
to that of men farmers can result in significant increases in yields by
women farmers. These findings are also summarized in a
slide in this module.
-
Another example of analytical work demonstrating the costs of neglecting
attention to gender issues in development comes from work on violence against
women. Estimates show that the global health burden of some forms of violence
against women ranks with public health concerns such as tuberculosis, cardilovascular
disease, HIV and cancer. This module contains a slide on these estimates
under Estimated
global health burden of selected conditions for women.
Current economic analysis of the costs of continuing gender inequalities
and the benefits of reducing these inequalities is ongoing. The research
agenda is vast. There is need for ILO to conduct more focused and rigorous
research on the costs to society of gender inequalities in the world of
work and the benefits of reducing these inequalities. The results of such
research can be persuasively used in ILO's policy dialogue with social
partners.
Module Homepage
For further information, please contact the South-East
Asia and the Pacific Multidisciplinary
Advisory Team (SEAPAT) at Tel: +63.2.815.2354
or Fax: +63.2.812.6143
E-mail: seapat@ilo.org



Copyright © 1998 International Labour Organization
(ILO)
Disclaimer
webinfo@ilo.org
Preferred : Netscape 3+ or MSIE
4.0
This page was revised by SF. It
was approved by WRB. It was last updated on 2 November 1998.